So if you haven’t heard the news, Blizzard has added two extremely adorable non-combat pets to the Blizzard Store. This was instantly controversial, with people calling Blizzard out for adding ‘microtransactions’ to the game, and being profiteers or some such.
They announced it yesterday. I’m sure half the blogging world has a post on it by now, that’s what we bloggers do, you see. We hear juicy topics of debate and our mouths start watering until we get to our keyboard.
Well, I had a whole post typed up about this and why I think this is nothing new. That it’s no different from buying loot cards and is in fact better because there is no middle man.
But when I told the news to Gadgets, his reaction was that it was cheating. After a lengthy conversation about why he thinks it’s cheating and how it’s different from buying loot cards, I was enlightened and found there are other ways to look at this than I initially did.
So instead, I’m going to outline our different outlooks, and how in the end, they seem to converge.
You see, Gadgets LOVES his achievements. He’s about halfway through his last reputation to get The Insane. Seriously, him and achievements should like… get married. Or something.
If you don’t already know my take on achievements, I’m a fan of them. But I rarely go out of my way for them unless it’s something I am passionate about or particularly interested in (see my Brewmaster, Chef and of Sen’jin titles).
Him and I have both been casually working towards the [Lil' Game Hunter] achievement (he’s at 73, I’m at 72). But we’re working at them for different reasons. Like I said, his epeen is measured in achievement points, and that’s fine. Me? I love cuddly little pets. Why do you think I rolled a hunter in the first place?! I had quite a collection of non-combat pets before the achievement system was even mentioned. If you ever see me in-game without a non-combat pet trailing behind me, assume my account has been hacked and notify the authorities!
Anyway, here’s how we each looked at the situation:
Brajana: When I saw these new pets, I equated them to buying a t-shirt or the murloc plushie from the Blizzard store. No one really needs them, but people want to buy them because they are cute, or because they want to show how much they like the game/their class/murlocs/cuddly things. $10 for an in-game plushie-type thing? Nothing wrong with that. Have you seen Lil’ K.T.? He’s adorable! And what’s different from the card game? Nothing. Except this is cheaper. And directly from Blizzard.
Gadgets: Of course, the first thing in his mind was the fact that $20 could get him from 73 to 75 for that tasty, tasty achievement. But he wouldn’t do it, because it wasn’t a reward for something and it wasn’t something he earned in-game. It’s like buying achievement points. Spend $20 and you’ll have this achievement is what he saw. Because he doesn’t run around town with a different pet each day. He doesn’t bring out holiday-specific pets when it’s appropriate, he doesn’t raid with a non-combat pet by his side. As for the card game, Gadgets thought of the loot cards as a reward for being a player of the TCG. Even if you sell it, you’re making money as a reward for playing.
And so we found our point of convergence on the topic:
Buying non-combat pets from Blizzard for the non-combat pet: Dandy.
Buying non-combat pets from Blizzard for achievement points: Stupid.
It’s a very small distinction.
Let me go back to my “Blizzard Merchandise” theory. If I bought the Murloc plushie because it’s amazingly cute and cuddly and I’d love to have it sitting on my desk greeting me every morning, fine!
But if I was buying the Murloc plushie because I have a plushie fetish and I’d just shove him in my box labeled “Plushies”, that’s just dumb.
But of course… this is purely an opinion.
The fact is that Blizzard is doing nothing wrong here. And I will continue to believe that until the day they start selling things that have a major effect on the game (i.e. gold, emblems or gear).
So what do you think?